

Compelled
by nature and/or destiny to struggle endlessly between communicating reality
and the reality of communicating, I now propose to let loose a flood of figures,
followed by relevant considerations, and finally by some pontificating on
how all that is (or is not) communicated by the mass media. So
let’s start: today, one in four Italians is over 60 years old. Italy leads
the list of the world’s “oldest” nations, followed, among others, by Japan,
Germany, Switzerland, Greece, Spain and Great Britain - all having an over-60
population between 21% and 25%. At the bottom of the list, together with other
African countries like Kenya and Angola but with other so-called Third World
countries as well, is Nigeria, whose over-60 population fraction is 3%.
So the old continent, as by definition, is Europe, and we are at the heart
of this “oldness”. There’s more: in 1950, people over 60 made up 8% of the
world population, in 2000 they were 10% and in 2005 they will be 21%, at which
point old-timers will be more numerous than children under 15. I have many
more figures to give, but let’s stop at these, the main ones. Where do these
data come from? From the United Nations World Assembly on Ageing, held in
Madrid during the second week of April, in the presence of representatives
of 164 countries and of more than 6000 delegates from NGOs (non-governmental
organizations). A good deal of considerations cascade from these data, beginning
with the troubling scenario of a planet-scale economical crisis that such
a rate of ageing entails, at least in terms of probability: serious unbalances,
in the more developed countries, between people who work, produce income and
pay taxes, and people who live on pensions, not to mention the increasing
demographic gap between wealthy and poor countries, migrations/invasions,
multiethnic integration, and so on.
Getting back to Italy and to its old-age leadership, all this translates into
a series of analyses, questions and problems connected with the possibility
of ensuring acceptable levels of assistance to senior citizens (a new name
for this magazine might be Old Leadership Medica), but also, I believe, into
an urgent need to reconsider our life, our cities, our countryside, etc. In
conclusion: do these issues deserve appropriate attention from the media in
a culturally civilized country? What else do we need to make the public opinion
in Italy aware of a problematic future that concerns us all and that is here
at hand? Being informed, you might reply, should be sufficient.
But the attention of the Italian media was practically non-existent - which
is absolutely disgraceful - concentrated as we were on the Cogne murder case
or on the nomination of RAI directors, when not, rightly, on the Middle East
tragedy. In Madrid, foreign journalists wanting to find out what the Italians
– or those who should keep them informed – think about population ageing and
its effects on the world’s oldest country, were forced to take note that Italian
media seem not to care at all. With their scanty presence in Madrid, and hardly
any reports in the newspapers, on TV or on the radio, a matter of epoch-making
import stands unattended, in all its levels outlined above. I have to admit
that yours truly, in the lifeboat of his daily radio programme, has already
sailed these seas. Alone. I’m growing old, that’s the truth...
Traslated by Interpres






